Best Lawyers in Chandigarh

Top High Court Advocates, Law Firms in Chandigarh

legal news

E-seva kendra opened at HC for advocates, complainants

1

By utilizing digital technology, the Telangana high court has unveiled a new e-seva kendra on Saturday to assist advocates and litigants. Chief Justice Alok Aradhe inaugurated the facility in the presence of Justice Sam Koshy, other judges, advocate general BS Prasad, Telangana bar council chairman A Narasimha Reddy, HC advocates association president Palle Nageswara Rao, deputy solicitor general Gadi Praveen Kumar, advocates, and staff.

2

Through this kendra, lawyers can check whether the judge assigned to their case is available or absent. The kendra also facilitates the e-filing of petitions and the creation of e-signatures, along with other technical tasks that litigants may struggle to do on their own.

Additionally, it offers the ability to obtain Aadhaar-based digital signatures. The kendra also provides training on utilizing video conferencing and e-courts, enabling advocates and their clients to present their case arguments remotely.

3

SC pulls up Gujarat HC for ‘lackadaisical’ approach on hearing MTP plea

1

The Supreme Court reprimanded the Gujarat High Court for its lack of urgency in reaching a decision on the abortion plea of a woman who is 26 weeks pregnant. Despite receiving a medical report in favor of termination, the High Court scheduled the hearing 12 days later. The Supreme Court ordered a fresh medical examination as the woman is now over 27 weeks pregnant. Justices B V Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan assembled on Saturday to grant an urgent hearing and directed that the examination take place that day, with the report filed by 6 pm on Sunday.

The bench stressed the need for urgency in such cases and expressed disappointment in the High Court’s lackadaisical approach. It emphasized that this matter should not be treated as ordinary and adjourned, remarking, “We are sorry to make this remark.” The bench further requested the Supreme Court registry to contact the registrar general of the High Court to ascertain whether the order had been uploaded. It stated that it could not proceed with the case without obtaining the High Court’s order.

2

The petitioner’s lawyer argued that the woman is now four days away from reaching 28 weeks of pregnancy, necessitating a fresh medical examination to assess the safety of termination. Agreeing with this submission, the bench directed for a new medical report.

Advocate Shashank Singh, representing the petitioner, informed the court that she had approached the High Court on August 7, and her plea was heard the following day. On August 11, a medical board, established on the High Court’s directive, submitted a report supporting termination. However, the case was scheduled for a hearing on August 23, a delay of 12 days. The petitioner discovered that the case status on the High Court website showed the petition had been rejected, and the order had not been uploaded. Noting the sequence of events as alleged by the petitioner, the bench emphasized that time is crucial in such cases and criticized the High Court for wasting valuable time. It stated, “We find that valuable time has been lost between August 11, when the report was placed before the High Court, and the order stating that the matter would stand over to August 23.”

3

All-faith prayer held at Jharkhand high court to ward off ‘evil spirits’

1

When a lawyer believes he has encountered a supernatural entity, who does he turn to for guidance? Surprisingly, not a judge, but a higher authority – God, or in this case, multiple gods. This raises the question: Why did the Advocates’ Association organize a multi-faith worship ceremony at Jharkhand’s new high court complex on Thursday?

Chief Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra, along with other judges, attended the puja alongside the lawyers. The new court building is located right next to a graveyard, and according to a government counsel, paranormal activities are a regular occurrence in the area. These activities allegedly include eerie howling sounds that are presumably not from animals.

2

It seems that the government lawyers, who often work late hours compared to their counterparts, are particularly affected by these unexplained happenings. However, the association secretary, Navin Kumar, differs in opinion. He claims that the worship ceremony was a customary practice when transitioning into a new workplace, and had nothing to do with the paranormal.

Regardless of the reason, it was comforting for the lawyers who believed they heard the strange howling sounds to have priests from different faiths, including Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, Christian, and Jain, as well as a tribal ‘pahan’, bless the court complex. The prasad (blessed food) provided during the ceremony was typical – ‘puri-sabji’, ‘kheer’, and ‘bundiya’.

3

The lingering question remains: will the howling sounds cease now that the complex has been blessed?

The newly-constructed two-storey court complex, spanning across 167 acres, was inaugurated on May 24 and commenced its first case on June 12.

Advocates sue federal government for failing to ban imports of cocoa harvested by children

1

Child welfare advocates have lodged a federal lawsuit insisting that a judge compel the Biden administration to bar the importation of cocoa produced by children in West Africa, which finds its way into popular chocolate desserts and candies in the United States. The lawsuit, initiated by International Rights Advocates, aims to enforce a federal law from the 1930s that obliges the government to prohibit the entry of goods manufactured through child labor. The non-profit organization claims that both Customs and Border Protection and the Department of Homeland Security have disregarded substantial evidence demonstrating the involvement of children in cocoa farming for renowned US candy producers, including Hershey, Mars, Nestle, and Cargill. Although major chocolate companies pledged to cease relying on child labor for cocoa harvesting by 2005, they now assert that they will eliminate the most severe forms of child labor from their supply chains by 2025.

Terry Collingsworth, the executive director of International Rights Advocates, affirmed, “They will never stop until they are forced to.” He further emphasized that the US government possesses the authority to terminate this tremendous abuse of African children by enforcing the law. Representatives for the Customs and Border Protection declined to comment regarding the lawsuit, which was filed in the US Court of International Trade. When queried more generally regarding cocoa cultivated via child labor, the federal agency stated that it was unable to disclose additional information or plans concerning enforcement activities pertaining to forced labor due to the protection of law enforcement-sensitive and business confidential data.

Child labor in cocoa farming within Cote d’Ivoire, commonly known as the Ivory Coast, as well as neighboring Ghana, is not a recent occurrence. Human rights leaders, academics, news organizations, and even federal agencies have spent the past two decades exposing the dire conditions under which children toil on cocoa plantations in these West African nations, which produce around 70% of the world’s cocoa supply.

2

A study conducted by the University of Chicago in 2019, commissioned by the US government, revealed that 790,000 children, some as young as five years old, labored on cocoa plantations in the Ivory Coast. Similar circumstances were identified in Ghana. The US government has long recognized that child labor constitutes a major problem in the Ivory Coast. In 2021, the Department of Labor reported that “children in Cote d’Ivoire are subjected to the worst forms of child labor, including in the harvesting of cocoa and coffee.”

According to a recent report from the State Department, agricultural companies in the Ivory Coast rely on child labor to produce various products, including cocoa. This year, the department noted that human traffickers “exploit Ivoirian boys and boys from West African countries, especially Burkina Faso, in forced labor in agriculture, especially cocoa production.”

In order to compel companies to abandon cocoa derived from child labor, International Rights Advocates has taken legal action against major chocolate producers regarding the use of child labor in cocoa bean harvesting. While it lost a case in front of the Supreme Court in 2021, several pending cases remain. Under the pressure of legislators and advocates, major chocolate manufacturers agreed in 2001 to discontinue the purchase of cocoa produced through child labor. However, experts and industry officials assert that this objective has not been achieved.

3

“These companies repeatedly claimed, ‘We can’t trace it back.’ It’s complete nonsense,” expressed former Senator Tom Harkin, who spearheaded a legislative effort to reform the industry. However, he eventually agreed to a protocol that allows corporations to self-regulate. “They simply refuse to do it because it will require financial investment.”

Harkin emphasized that Americans are unaware that the treats they give their children are connected to child abuse. “It’s not just the chocolate you consume, but also the chocolate syrup you pour on your ice cream, the cocoa you drink, and the chocolate chip cookies you bake,” he stated.
The World Cocoa Foundation, representing major cocoa companies, claimed dedication to enhancing the well-being of cocoa farmers and their communities.

A spokesperson from Hershey affirmed that the company “does not tolerate child labor within our supply chain.” Cargill, Nestle, and Mars did not respond to requests for comment. However, their websites outline their efforts to eliminate child labor in cocoa plantations.

While Ivory Coast officials expressed steps taken to eradicate child labor, blocking cocoa imports from the country would severely impact the nation’s economy.

“We don’t aim to render the entire country unemployed,” stated Collingsworth, the labor advocate who initiated the lawsuit filed on Tuesday. “We simply want children to be replaced by adults in cocoa plantations.”

4

Collingsworth was conducting an investigation into working conditions in Ivory Coast when he observed children laboring in clearing brush and harvesting cocoa. He documented their activities through photos and videos captured on his phone. Additionally, he visited a nearby processing facility and photographed burlap sacks bearing the labels of US companies.

In 2020, International Rights Advocates decided to petition the CBP (Customs and Border Protection) to block cocoa imports. Their 24-page petition presented photographic evidence and other documentation demonstrating how these companies were violating the law.

Collingsworth mentioned that his organization also provided the CBP with interviews featuring children as young as 12 who claimed their wages were withheld. These children stated that they were deceived by recruiters, lured into working long hours with the false promise of receiving their own land.

According to the lawsuit, CBP failed to take any action on the petition.